Right. So Peter King and The Antimodern Condition. I think what he has to say about the antimodern condition is a lot of what I've been writing about these last few years--the need for community, the need for stability, traditions, groundedness, a lack of novelty, a deep inhabitation and remembrance of the past.
From the book:
"We can see the world either as a process of change or as a
point of acceptance: it can be transgression or accommodation, movement or
stasis, harmony or displacement. To
create change is to displace, to move ourselves away from where we currently
are. It is where we reject the idea of
keeping ourselves in place and seek to keep moving. We forget that we dwell and seek instead to
transgress. We see virtue in movement
and change and we repudiate the static point.
Yet where we keep moving, when we stay in transit, we can never be sure
of where we are.
But to dwell is to recognise that we are points of being
rather than processes of movement. We
are fixed points in the world, existing within a web of relations. We are rooted and connected through well-worn
ruts of meaning. And we seek to maintain
these and persist with them and we do so precisely because they keep us
fixed. We do not wish to be pulled away
from our place, to be uprooted or to be taken out of those ruts we know so
well. If we are uprooted, then we become
displaced and disoriented and our connections with others become strained. So we do not seek to break new ground, but
instead we relish the anchor, the foundation, the solidity of the known; we
know our place, and the meanings that this exerts on us are palpable and help
to ground us.
This notion of being in place is threatened by modernity and
the chase for progress. As we have seen,
progress insists that we set ourselves apart from the world. We seek to improve our condition and we
refuse to accept what we have now as anything other than transient and
contingent. Nothing is therefore beyond
transgression. We believe in our own
perfectability and so cannot accept the boundaries of our current life. We always want better and believe that
achievement is possible. The desire—the need—for
transgression inherent in modernity precludes stability. There is no one place, but a series of
temporary holdouts from where we plan our next move. What we lose in this desire for transgression
is our connection with the world. We
forget the closeness, the openness we have to the world and which it has for
us. Our loss is one of balance, the
ability to remain level with what is around us." (4-5)
In order to inhabit a premodern (or antimodern) mindset, we need to stop glorifying change and embrace stasis--to acknowledge that our lives have limits, and that we must live within those boundaries. We need to stop our anxious striving and accept things as they are. It is to acknowledge that we are individuals within a closed system, and that we have a specific place and function within that system. We do not exist as islands. We are part of an interconnected web with the environment, our fellow man, and ourselves, and to deny that, to embrace progress as the only virtue, to constantly seek change, is to be at odds with all that is normative about the world.
Writes King (emphasis in original):
…in looking for what is absent and hoping for something
different from what we now have, we forget what it is we do have. Instead what we have now is taken for
granted; we see it as too ordinary and seek to replace it with the
extraordinary, to replace the common with the designed. We forget why we have these ordinary things
in our rush for the new and different, but, in doing so, we end up with rather
less than we had hoped for. Because our
striving is boundless and we continually struggle to reach the next rung up the
ladder, we never have what we hope for, but
neither do we fully use what we have. We fail to see the virtues of the things in
front of us because we are looking so far away. (101)
The antimodern condition is to acknowledge the messiness of life, to keep one's feet planted firmly on the ground, and seek contentment in and fully use what has been given by God already. I know these are hard concepts to truly embrace and understand, particularly in our consumerist and commodified society which fetishizes the novel and the trendy. The consumer model is designed to make everyone feel two steps behind, to seek change and novelty, to be blind to the things already in one's possession. I'm going to try and take King's ideas in, let them curl under my skin, root down in me. I want to remove the scales from my eyes to see the material blessings in my home, to be content with what I have, with the life I lead, to keep the past ever before me, and to seek creative occupation that acknowledges my place in the world. I will have to work at changing the language I use when I talk and think about material things, and how I relate to others. I think there is much value in what has passed before, and we can learn much from it, particularly in How to Live. It is a peculiar characteristic of the anxious post-modern age that the past is forgotten, that we must forever forge new paths through the woods, and learn anew the ways of doing.
I fear I have summarized King's ideas badly, but there is so much meat in his short tome that it was hard to condense everything down to a few paragraphs. I appreciate his articulation of the anxieties of the post modern world--sometimes it helps to have someone else say, yes, the discomfort you feel about our age, there's something to it. I realize that a lot of it is our own fallen condition, and King doesn't acknowledge the role of God or of religion in mitigating the modern condition, and I think is one of the shortfalls of his book. My other complaint about the book is that there are portions of it that made me feel as though I'd walked into discussion that had been going on for some time and missed the salient argument, as King spends a not insignificant portion of the book arguing with other philosophers who've written on the topic. Where the book shines, however, is when King sets aside the academic pedantics and simply speaks about his topic.
Perhaps this is all a bit of navel-gazing by a Westerner in a comfortable chair, and perhaps some of my readers will be scratching their heads about now, wondering what I'm on about with this topic. I admit to possessing an overly analytic mind, and it is hard for me to simply do things without thinking categorically about them in some way. I think it is important to know the old ways of doing and being, to be rooted where we are, and be content.















