Wednesday, November 30, 2016

Project 333: Fall Wrap

November 30 and that means the last day of my fall rotation!  I'm not exactly sick of this rotation yet (not like how I'm always ready to burn my summer rotation by September 1!) but I'm ready to move into winter clothing.  I've been feeling a bit cold in the last week or so, and my options have been limited.  


Far left: Zwei Leben denim skirt, rust cord skirt
Top Middle: purple elbow tshirt, dark teal button up knit shirt, striped boatneck, rust henley
Middle: rust lightweight cardigan, dark green light weight cardigan, navy light weight cardigan, red light wool cardigan
Bottom Middle: cranberry waffle henley, green Ramona cardigan, burgundy wool cardigan

Once I got over my initial flurry of changes, my closet stayed pretty stable.  It is different from where I started, but the winnowing process was good, and I wore almost everything I had in my rotation this time.

I mostly wore my Dottie Angel dresses this fall, and didn't really get into my separates that much.  I did wear the blouses with my denim skirt a few times before the weather cooled, and I wore my Liberty dresses a ton when it was still in the 90s in September.  My chambray dress didn't get a lot of love this rotation; I prefer a looser waist line at the moment. 


Left: Rennie dress, chambray dress, Liberty #2 dress, olive knit eshakti dress
Middle: teal knit eshakti dress, burgundy rayon floral blouse, navy linen dress, autumn floral blouse
Right: Kennedy dress, gray linen dress, Liberty #1 dress, evergreen linen dress

I barely wore the green and navy lightweight cardigans, in part because I sort of forgot about them.  I put my two heavy weight cardigans in easy view, whereas the lighter ones were in a drawer away from my tops, and I just didn't see them.  I also think that because I tended to wear a shirt under my dresses, the third layer wasn't as necessary for most of this season.

The major hits of the rotation were the three linen dresses I made--I wore them constantly, usually with a knit shirt underneath.  The surprise hit was the Kennedy dress--I was on the fence about it after the photos I took in October.  I later realized that some dresses look better with layers and others look better without.  It helped that my layering dresses were slightly heavier weight than the thin lawn dresses that looked better without.

I almost wore the Kennedy for our Thanksgiving gathering, but the navy linen with the rust henley underneath won the day.  I was so comfortable all day!  I also wore that outfit to a birthday party in a park earlier in the fall and really liked it then as well.
 

A couple of misses: the red knit eshakti dress is too short for my preference.  I was buying my dresses to hit just at the bottom of my knee last year, and I really prefer another inch or two, particularly on these full-skirted dresses.  The olive green and dark teal knit dresses are my preferred length and I'm carrying them into my winter rotation.  They both got a lot of wear this fall.  I bought the teal one a size up since that style seems to run small in the arms and torso, and so it is a little roomy, but I think that is not a bad thing.  Some days you want less fitted.

I also noticed that my "wool" red sweater has a bit of acrylic in it, which explains why I sometimes feel simultaneously hot and cold in it.  I'm trying to decide what to do with it, as I do like the color and length, and it goes with a bunch of stuff in my closet, but I don't like wearing synthetics if I can help it.

My Ramona cardigan is starting to look pretty sad and ratty, so I'm not sure how much longer it will last.  I made a not-so-great choice in the yarn, and it pills constantly and picks up everything in sight.  I also made Russian joins throughout the sweater which was a mistake, given the weight of the yarn--the joins are a little more obvious than I would like.  I do wear it a lot, and it goes with a ton of things in my closet, so I'll probably make a similar green one in Swish sometime next year.  I'm hoping to limp it through my winter rotation and then retire it.

The burgundy wool cardigan is a nice sweater, and I wore it a lot because it is warm, but I don't think it is the most flattering thing I own.  The color isn't that great on me, and the shape is pretty boxy.  But it goes well with a lot of things in this rotation, so I'll probably hang on to it.  I wish I could find one that was similar in weight but more to a cranberry shade.

I'll share my winter rotation tomorrow!

Friday, November 25, 2016

Let's Party Like It's 1765

Every year, my kids' school has a History Day celebration sometime in November, usually near the Thanksgiving break.  It is a nice way to end before the long break for Thanksgiving, and the kids look forward to it almost as much as the spring Literature Day celebration.  They get to dress up in costume and participate in a ton of history-related activities all day.  

In classical curriculum, the students study a different period of history each year, starting with the ancient world in kindergarten.  By the time they are in 3rd grade, they are studying the modern period (about 1800-1900).  In 6th grade, they start over again with the ancient world and delve more deeply into material as they move through middle school and high school.

Piglet is in 3rd grade this year, and his costume options included colonial dress, so he decided to go as George Washington.  

Boo's class is studying the medieval period, so he went as Robin Hood.


Birdie is in kindergarten so she went as a Roman princess.

When I heard that Piglet's class was focusing on colonial history, my ears perked up.  Long time readers might remember my brief foray into 18th century costuming way back in 2014.  I hadn't really abandoned it, but I did shelve the project for a long while.  I have been steadily researching textile history and keeping up with other 18th century historical costumers these last years.  

In any case, I decided that I could cobble together a working class outfit and make a presentation about it, if the teacher was interested.  She was enthusiastic about the idea (and it helped that the kids had visited a colonial farm in early November), so I spent a rather frantic 6 weeks putting together all the pieces I lacked, including stays!  (gulp!)  I'll try to do a post about constructing the individual pieces soon, but thought I'd share the photos from my presentation in the meantime.  I asked a friend to take them and she was sitting on the floor with the kids, hence the angle.


I started out in my shift, cap, and stockings.  (I had some modesty stuff underneath the shift to keep it decent in a public place).  I talked about my cap, and that I wore it to keep my hair clean since I would be working over an open flame most of the time, and also because it was considered proper for women to cover their hair.  I explained what a shift was, and that it was a prehistoric garment worn across many societies and cultures, by both men and women.  The basic shape didn't change much over time, and was constructed from a long rectangle of fabric.  


I explained that it was made from linen in order to make washing easier, and that people changed their shifts the way that we change our underwear.  I talked about pre-modern water usage (no running water = no easy baths or showers) and how keeping clean was different from today.  


I put on my garters to hold up my stockings, and explained that before elastic, women and men needed something to hold up their socks!  Many 18th century garters are embroidered with funny sayings, but mine were pretty plain (a folk-ware inspired ribbon strip on linen ribbon ties)  Then shoes.  (Cardinal rule: shoes before stays)


I talked about my stays, gave a brief history (starting with the Elizabethan "pair of bodies") and talked a little about how they are constructed.  I forgot to mention that stays were primarily made by professional stay-makers who tended to be men, because it takes a fair amount of finger and hand strength to sew stays (speaking from personal experience!)


Mine are front and back lacing so that I could get into them myself.  Stays can be front- or back-only lacing, and some maternity stays laced on the sides.  I find front and back lacing stays to be most comfortable as they are more adjustable for optimum fit.  They are also much easier to get into by yourself!


Lacing.


Still lacing.


Pulling it all tight.  Stays were not tight laced, but rather provided good back support for the heavy labor of the day, and also to give the body a particular shape under clothing.  The goal was a conical torso shape, not small measurements.


Tying the ends into a bow to secure the lacing.  I added my pockets here (you can see them peeking out in the photo below)  Pockets were a separate item of clothing for women until the late 19th century, when dresses became extremely fitted over the hips and separate pockets ruined the line of the dress and became impractical.  You read sometimes about women losing a pocket at a ball or some such.


This is my modesty petticoat, which is shorter than a regular petticoat skirt, and designed to prevent wardrobe malfunctions in a high wind or other activities where skirts might fly up!  As women (and men) didn't wear anything under their shifts/shirts, this was a real concern.  


It laces front to back, just like a regular petticoat skirt.  I made this out of a yard of linen and pleated it to a linen tape.  The slit in the side allows access to the pockets.


Then my heavy flannel petticoat.  You can see how it ties here.  The kids were curious about all the ties and lacings.  I explained that since washing machines hadn't been invented yet, clothing had to be cleaned by beating it with a stick in running water, so whatever was on your clothes had to be able to survive that.  Buttons wouldn't, and were too expensive for my farmer's wife persona.  Most clothing was laced or pinned shut.


Then I added my final petticoat skirt, a heavy-weight gold linen that I lurve so much.  I can't wear that color next to my face, and this was a fun way to be able to wear it!


I used two full yards and pleated them to a double fold bias tape that I sewed shut on the ends.  It isn't as historically accurate as the linen tape, but it worked okay.


Then my shortgown, made from some heavy weight linen scraps.  A short gown is a t-shaped jacket without closures that has cut-on sleeves.  I had to do some piecing to get it to work, but they would have done in the 18th century as well, so I figured it was all to the good.  I left it unlined because I ran out of fabric.  I based the shape on several extant short gowns, and the length and general measurements are similar.


There is some debate about whether linen would have been used for an outer garment like this, but I think it must have been since cotton was used once widely available.  These jackets and many dresses of the period were often held together with small straight pins.  


There was in fact a shortage of pins during the Revolutionary War, and Abigail Adams writes to her husband John, in England at the time, and begs him to send her a bundle of pins in his next consignment to her, as they are desperately in need.  I read out part of the letter.  I made a little pincushion on a ribbon tie to wear on my apron, since women would have wanted pins near to hand in case they lost one on their clothes during the day.


Pinning shut.  The pins are inserted lengthwise, with the pointed end down.  Someone asked me if the pins would stick you during the day, and my answer is no, because: stays. There are four layers of heavy cloth plus bones between you and any errant pin pricks.  Another person wondered about holding babies with straight pins in the clothes, but babies tended to be swaddled in lots of layers of linen at the time, so I suspect they wouldn't have made contact with the sharp points all that often.


Tucking in my fichu (neckerchief).  It fills in the neckline and adds some modesty to the low cut of the shift and stays.


Adding my apron.  I showed them how the apron can be tucked up into a little pouch to hold things like potatoes or other garden produce.  I'm sure the pouches were used to carry other things as well!


And finally, my Bergère hat!  It is quite a hack job, but it worked well for the presentation.


Bet you'll never guess what it is made of!  (Hint: a placemat)  It is tied on over my cap.


The finished outfit!  The hat would only be appropriate for going "to town" or other public places, whereas my cap is more appropriate around the house.  This outfit is the 18th century equivalent of jeans and a t-shirt.


I'm ready to haul water, chop wood, tend my cooking fire and the copper, weed the garden, slop the pigs, milk the cow, and generally do the hard labor of the farm!

I'm sure there are a ton of Historical Sew Monthly challenges tied up in this outfit, but I'll hit the details later.

Tuesday, November 22, 2016

Talking Tuesday: Take a Deep Breath

I don't know how things are in your neck of the post-election woods, but we've had choppers overhead every night and early morning for the last two weeks and it doesn't look to let up any time soon.  Frankly, I'm weary of it all.  The whole thing.  This election cycle broke Facebook for me, possibly permanently.  The ugliness that I saw from both sides makes me feel sad and lonely.  I will say for the record that I didn't have a dog in this fight; I voted third party for my conscience.

I try to refrain from discussing politics on this blog, but I think today is a good day to share this wonderful reflection by Brian Kaller of Restoring Mayberry, in the hopes that it will provide some ballast to the current mood of the nation.  Please read the whole thing--he makes a lot of good points and has the advantage of being somewhat removed from the fray.

From the article:

"I don’t know what kind of president Mr. Trump will be– by all means, keep a watchful eye on his administration. Clinton supporters can stop, however, going on as though they’ve been robbed of the glorious future they were supposed to have, if only their candidate had been elected, and that we are now sliding into an age of evil and darkness. No political figure will fix or destroy everything. There is no bomb counting down to Too Late, no point at which it is Game Over, nor any point where our story ends Happily Ever After. The nation is not a ship that can sink or a train that was speeding towards Progressistan; it was not derailed, and will not get Back on Track.

You won’t defeat the Moonbats, Wingnuts, Useful Idiots or Forces of Hatred, because those are imaginary concepts from a web site – the people on the other side are named Molly and Amy and Adam, and they are trying to do the right thing just like you are. The odds of they, and you, dying is 100% in the long run, but the odds of dying in the next few years in a Zombie Apocalypse, Nuclear Armageddon or Nazi Death Camp are quite low. Remember, we’ve been through this many times before, and we’re still here.

No matter what happens, no matter what your politics, there is one thing that’s bound to help your country in the years ahead. You could help rebuild the social institutions around you -- churches, fraternal organizations, town halls, unions, markets, and webs of mutual obligation – that have so deeply deteriorated. They are what democracy used to be, before it became images on a screen. They are what our dreams used to be made of. They are what kept towns and neighbourhoods functioning fifty or a hundred or two hundred years ago, back before we looked to a candidate to fix everything for us."

~Brian Kaller, "Backing Away from Hyperbole," Restoring Mayberry Blog, November 20, 2016

Put not your trust in princes or in sons of men.