This is possibly an odd post for the end of May, but I wanted to show my completed Spring Evendoon before the weather makes it completely ridiculous to write about a wool sweater. I finished it on May 13 and blocked it and photographed it the next day, when it was still chilly enough in the morning to get away with it. The temps are supposed to drop to the 50s over the weekend (hooray!) so I might even get to wear it. (Although my Cypress sweater is on the block now, so I might wear that instead!)

So, the Evendoon. I cast this on immediately after finishing the Lilias Day
in part because I was so disappointed that the Lilias wasn't going to
work for me and I loved the palette so much. (The friend I sent the
sweater to is delighted with it). This is a basic raglan knit, but the striping pattern keeps you on your
toes, particularly during the raglan increases, as you have to keep
track of two things at once. It was also a LOT of ends to weave in as I
knitted the sleeves flat and seamed (which I'm never doing again as I
finally figured out a way of knitting small in the round that doesn't
make me want to claw my eyes out).

I decided to stick to the same (stashed) palette and go for a striped
version using Kate Davies Evendoon pattern. (Her palette on the
multi-stripe version is very similiar to mine) This was another case of
a sweater pattern I didn't notice when it came out but found very
pleasing in a different colorway. I originally combined the same two
Jamieson and Smith yarns for the aqua stripe as I did on the Lilias Day,
but it was coming out closer to worsted gauge, so I decided better too
light than too heavy and tinked back to use a single strand of the
J&S which does bloom nicely with wet blocking. I like the bright
palette very much!
I again went with the 3rd size, even though I usually make a 2 in Kate's
sizing, because I wanted slightly more ease and was concerned about the
fit. The fit is spot on! I did have to change the bottom slightly from the sample, as the extra
two stripes made the body too long for my short torso, and I didn't like
how the Jamieson and Smith knitted up in the ribbing on the bottom or
neckline (I was also playing yarn chicken with the J&S, and wanted
to be able to get the sleeves out). I like how the cuffs, hem, and
neckband all match and keep the stripe pattern.
In book news, I've been reading Matthieu Pageau's book called
The Language of Creation
and having my mind generally blown about all the symbolism and fractal
connections in the stories of the Bible. More than that, it is a
framework for interpreting and understanding the world. (Jonathan Pageau said that when he was editing the book for his brother,
every time he read the manuscript, he would get to about page 100 and
start having seizures about the amazing insights and connections. Page
100 nothing; I was having seizures on about page five. Needless to say,
it is not a book to rush through, but rather should be taken in small
bites.)
It all goes
back to the garden, or as Paul Kingsnorth memorably put it: "we are all
still trying to eat the apple." (He's been killing it on his
substack
this month--it is well worth the subscription!
"Blanched Sun, Blinded
Man" is a great introductory essay about the enchantment of the Machine we all find
ourselves in. I'm eager to read the rest of this series as it comes
out). Around the same time that I started Matthieu's book, I watched the largely panned film
Noah,
and found it to be much better than the critics said. It fits well
with the symbolic structure that the Pageau brothers talk about, and
pulls from lots of traditional sources including the Apocrypha for
additional details not included in the Pentateuch.
This week, I started reading a book I got for my birthday last summer called 1983: Reagan, Andropov, and a World on the Brink.
It is a book about how close we came to nuclear annihilation in 1983
because of a number of factors that collided that year. I'm completely
fascinated. What I like about the author's approach is that he is
clear-eyed about both sides of the story, painting neither a flattering
nor unflattering picture of either Reagan or Andropov, and giving equal
time to the concerns of both sides.
I think it is easy for people of my generation or a bit older to lionize
Reagan because of the perception of stability that he fostered--or at least a kind of clean polarity--but
with time and distance comes some wisdom about the ways in which Reagan
actually contributed rather heavily to the sort of political discourse
in which we now find ourselves, and the instability of international
relations more generally. One wonders if a president with a longer
attention span and better impulse control would have been a better
choice at that time in history.
A quirky documentary called The Man Who Saved the World came my way this week as well, and I highly recommend it. It is about a little-known incident in the USSR where a Soviet colonel averted a major nuclear war in the late summer of 1983.
(Incidentally, the film glosses over the disaster of the Korean airliner at the beginning of the film, with lots of heart-breaking footage of the aftermath, but the 1983 book gives a great deal more context and information about what happened, and while it was a terrible tragedy, there are a great many questionable things on the part of the captain and crew that led to that point. Moral of the story: stay in the captain's seat and man your radio).
In between seizures over great stuff from Jonathan Pageau and his brother Matthieu, I am also rewatching The Americans, which is set in the early 1980s, and am drawn in anew, with different eyes to see this time.
My brain is cookin'. Hold on to your hats!